home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
020590
/
0205220.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
4KB
|
96 lines
<text id=90TT0325>
<title>
Feb. 05, 1990: A New Daily For Sports Nuts
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
Feb. 05, 1990 Mandela:Free At Last?
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
PRESS, Page 66
A New Daily for Sports Nuts
</hdr>
<body>
<p>The National gambles on insatiable--and literate--fans
</p>
<p> When USA Today first appeared in 1982, many customers
eagerly seized the paper's statistics-laden sports section and
chucked the rest into the trash. Within the past year, after
losing some $800 million, the Gannett daily finally became
profitable. But starting this week it will face competition for
the sports nut: the National, the first U.S. all-sports daily.
The paper, to be published every day but Saturday, will feature
32 to 48 pages of news, opinion and gossip, with up to half the
pages in color. Satellites will enable the National to cover
late games, while Dow Jones, parent of the Wall Street Journal,
will provide a proven distribution system.
</p>
<p> The National will be overseen by Frank Deford, a former
SPORTS ILLUSTRATED writer and NBC commentator who was six times
named sportswriter of the year. Deford, who has not edited a
publication since his days at Princeton, says he will write a
column after the start-up, and regards managing editor Van
McKenzie as day-to-day chief.
</p>
<p> Deford is far from the paper's only celebrity writer: by
dangling salaries reportedly ranging up to $250,000, the
National has gathered a 130-member editorial staff that
includes columnists Mike Lupica from the New York Daily News
and Dave Kindred from the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, as well
as editors from the Boston Globe and Fort Worth Star-Telegram.
Boasts Deford: "We will offer the finest collection of writers
ever assembled at one daily."
</p>
<p> Despite the literary aspirations of those big names, the
trend in sports coverage almost everywhere is away from elegant
prose and toward number crunching: in sports, there is a
statistic for practically everything. The message has not been
lost on the National. Says columnist Kindred: "We hope to have
pretty writing. We also hope to have every ugly box score you
have ever seen." The paper will offer localized editions
wherever it is sold--for starters in New York City, Chicago
and Los Angeles. After a gradual five-year expansion,
seemingly modeled on that of USA Today, it plans to publish a
separate edition in every city with a major league franchise
for baseball, basketball, football or hockey.
</p>
<p> While sports dailies thrive in other nations, including
France and Italy, they tend to stress facts and figures rather
than slick writing. The National, on the other hand, presents
itself as a literate journal aiming at young, well-off college
graduates, presumably male. Some 1,200 pages of ads have been
sold for the first year, 20% above initial projections, thanks
in large part to Deford's credibility, which he has exploited
by pitching to potential advertisers in person. Says Drew
Marcus, an analyst at Kidder Peabody: "The paper is going after
a very narrow niche, but one with a possibility of success."
</p>
<p> The National is financed by Mexican media tycoon Emilio
Azcarraga Milmo, who dominates his country's TV production. He
also counts a pro soccer team among an estimated $1 billion in
holdings. The new daily's publisher, Peter Price, erstwhile
publisher of the New York Post, says the start-up cost $25
million and predicts losses of only $100 million more during
the expansion. Price says the paper should break even, at a
circulation of 750,000 a day, within two years. USA Today
president Tom Curley is skeptical. Says he: "$100 million
doesn't square with our experience."
</p>
<p> The paper's fate depends on two unpredictable factors. One
is whether early issues are lively and error-free; hard-core
fans are notoriously unforgiving. The other is whether enough
people really want all that coverage every day from all those
fancy columnists and feature writers. Onlookers offer scenarios
aplenty but admit that the National is hard to assess because
it is unprecedented--one might say, a whole new ball game.
</p>
<p>By William A. Henry III. Reported by Naushad S. Mehta/New York.
</p>
</body>
</article>
</text>